Commit Graph

20688 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sebastian Markbåge
8e3db095aa [DevTools] Make a non-editable name of KeyValue clickable (#34095)
This has been bothering me. You can click the arrow and the value to
expand/collapse a KeyValue row but not the name.

When the name is not editable it should be clickable. Such as when
inspecting a Promise value.
2025-08-04 09:27:37 -04:00
Sebastian Markbåge
041754697c [DevTools] Only show state for ClassComponents (#34091)
The only thing that uses `memoizedState` as a public API is
ClassComponents. Everything else uses it as internals. We shouldn't ever
show those internals.

Before those internals showed up for example on a suspended Suspense
boundary:

<img width="436" height="370" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-03 at 8 13 37 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7fe275a7-d5da-421d-a000-523825916630"
/>
2025-08-04 09:26:12 -04:00
Ruslan Lesiutin
30fca45c1c fix: apply initial horizontal offset on tree mount (#34088)
When the element is pre-selected and the Tree component is mounted,
right now we are only applying initial vertical offset, but not the
horizontal one.

Because of this, if the DOM element was selected on Elements panel and
then user opens Components panel for the first time of the browser
DevTools session, depending on the element's depth, it could be hidden.

Similarly to vertical offset, apply horizontal one, but via ref setter.

### Before:

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0ab3cca9-93c1-4e9e-8d23-88330d438912

### After:

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/10de153a-1e55-4cf7-b1ff-4cc7cb35ba10
2025-08-04 12:12:53 +01:00
Sebastian Markbåge
c499adf8c8 [Flight] Allow Temporary References to be awaited (#34084)
Fixes #33534.

`.then` method can be tested when you await a value that's not a
Promise. For regular Client References we have a way to mark those as
"async" and yield a reference to the unwrapped value in case it's a
Promise on the Client.

However, the realization is that we never serialize Promises as opaque
when passed from the client to the server. If a Promise is passed, then
it would've been deserialized as a Promise (while still registered as a
temporary reference) and not one of these Proxy objects.

Technically it could be a non-function value on the client which would
be wrong but you're not supposed to dot into it in the first place.

So we can just assume it's `undefined`.
2025-08-02 18:44:20 -04:00
Dennis Kats
1d163962b2 Allow returning a temporary reference inside an async function (#33761)
<!--
  Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.

Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:

1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
  2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
  9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
  10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.

Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->

## Summary

Fixes `await`-ing and returning temporary references in `async`
functions. These two operations invoke `.then()` under the hood if it is
available, which currently results in an "Cannot access then on the
server. You cannot dot into a temporary client reference..." error. This
can easily be reproduced by returning a temporary reference from a
server function.

Fixes #33534 

## How did you test this change?
I added a test in a new test file. I wasn't sure where else to put it.
<img width="771" height="138" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/09ffe6eb-271a-4842-a9fe-c68e17b3fb41"
/>


<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
  If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
2025-08-02 18:11:54 -04:00
Joseph Savona
ddf8bc3fba [compiler] Improve merging of scopes that invalidate together (#34049)
We try to merge consecutive reactive scopes that will always invalidate
together, but there's one common case that isn't handled.

```js
const y = [[x]];
```

Here we'll create two consecutive scopes for the inner and outer array
expressions. Because the input to the second scope is a temporary,
they'll merge into one scope.

But if we name the inner array, the merging stops:

```js
const array = [x];
const y = [array];
```

This is because the merging logic checks if all the dependencies of the
second scope are outputs of the first scope, but doesn't account for
renaming due to LoadLocal/StoreLocal. The fix is to track these
temporaries.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34049).
* __->__ #34049
* #34047
* #34044
2025-08-01 13:00:01 -07:00
Joseph Savona
0860b9cc1f [compiler] Add definitions for Object entries/keys/values (#34047)
Fixes remaining issue in #32261, where passing a previously useMemo()-d
value to `Object.entries()` makes the compiler think the value is
mutated and fail validatePreserveExistingMemo. While I was there I added
Object.keys() and Object.values() too.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34047).
* #34049
* __->__ #34047
* #34044
2025-08-01 12:59:49 -07:00
Sebastian Markbåge
538ac7ae4b [Flight] Fix debug info leaking to outer handler (#34081)
The `waitForReference` call for debug info can trigger inside a
different object's initializingHandler. In that case, we can get
confused by which one is the root object.

We have this special case to detect if the initializing handler's object
is `null` and we have an empty string key, then we should replace the
root object's value with the resolved value.


52612a7cbd/packages/react-client/src/ReactFlightClient.js (L1374)

However, if the initializing handler actually should have the value
`null` then we might get confused by this and replace it with the
resolved value from a debug object. This fixes it by just using a
non-empty string as the key for the waitForReference on debug value
since we're not going to use it anyway.

It used to be impossible to get into this state since a `null` value at
the root couldn't have any reference inside itself but now the debug
info for a `null` value can have outstanding references.

However, a better fix might be using a placeholder marker object instead
of null or better yet ensuring that we know which root we're
initializing in the debug model.
2025-08-01 15:44:48 -04:00
lauren
52612a7cbd [compiler] Emit more specific error when making identifiers with reserved words (#34080)
This currently throws an invariant which may be misleading. I checked
the ecma262 spec and used the same list of reserved words in our check.
To err on the side of being conservative, we also error when strict mode
reserved words are used.
2025-08-01 15:10:34 -04:00
Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann
bdb4a96f62 [DevTools] Lazily compute initial Tree state (#34078) 2025-08-01 17:49:25 +02:00
Sebastian Markbåge
c260b38d0a [DevTools] Clean up Virtual Instances from id map (#34063)
This was a pretty glaring memory leak. 🙈

I forgot to clean up the VirtualInstances from the id map so the Server
Component instances always leaked in DEV.
2025-07-31 10:30:31 -04:00
Sebastian Markbåge
5bbf9be246 [DevTools] Model Hidden Offscreen Boundaries as Unmounts (#34062)
This is modeling Offscreen boundaries as the thing that unmounts a tree
in the frontend. This will let us model this as a "hide" that preserves
state instead in a follow up but not yet.

By doing it this way, we don't have to special case suspended Suspense
boundaries, at least not for the modern versions that use Offscreen as
the internal node. It's still special cased for the old React versions.
Instead, this is handled by the Offscreen fiber getting hidden.

By giving this fiber an FilteredFiberInstance, we also have somewhere to
store the children on (separately from the parent children set which can
include other siblings too like the loading state).

One consequence is that Activity boundary content now disappears when
they're hidden which is probably a good thing since otherwise it would
be confusing and noisy when it's used to render multiple pages at once.
2025-07-31 10:30:10 -04:00
Josh Story
8de7aed892 [Fizz] Count Boundary bytes that may contribute to the preamble in the request byteSize (#34059)
Stacked on #34058

When tracking how large the shell is we currently only track the bytes
of everything above Suspense boundaries. However since Boundaries that
contribute to the preamble will always be inlined when the shell flushes
they should also be considered as part of the request byteSize since
they always flush alongside the shell. This change adds this tracking
2025-07-30 18:18:57 -07:00
Josh Story
98773466ce [Fizz] Don't outline Boundaries that may contribute to the preamble (#34058)
Suspense boundaries that may have contributed to the preamble should not
be outlined due to size because these boundaries are only meant to be in
fallback state if the boundary actually errors. This change excludes any
boundary which has the potential to contribute to the preamble. We could
alternatively track which boundaries actually contributed to the
preamble but in practice there will be very few and I think this is
sufficient.

One problem with this approach is it makes Suspense above body opt out
of the mode where we omit rel="expect" for large shells. In essence
Suspense above body has the semantics of a Shell (it blocks flushing
until resolved) but it doesn't get tracked as request bytes and thus we
will not opt users into the skipped blocking shell for very large
boundaries.

This will be fixed in a followup
2025-07-30 18:06:47 -07:00
Sebastian Markbåge
9784cb379e [DevTools] No suspending above the root (#34055)
Follow up to #34050.

It's not actually possible to suspend *above* the root since even if you
suspend in the first child position, you're still suspending the
HostRoot which always has a corresponding FiberInstance and
SuspenseNode.
2025-07-30 11:31:27 -04:00
Sebastian Markbåge
dcf2a6f665 [DevTools] Keep a Suspense Tree Parellel to the Instance tree in the Backend (#34050)
This keeps a data structure of Suspense boundaries and the root which
can keep track which boundaries might participate in a loading sequence
and everything that suspends them. This will power the Suspense tab.

Now when you select a `<Suspense>` boundary the "suspended by" section
shows the whole boundary instead of just that component.

In the future, we'll likely need to add "Activity" boundaries to this
tree as well, so that we can track what suspended the root of an
Activity when filtering a subtree. Similar to how the root SuspenseNode
now tracks suspending at the root. Maybe it's ok to just traverse to
collect this information on-demand when you select one though since this
doesn't contribute to the deduping.

We'll also need to add implicit Suspense boundaries for the rows of a
SuspenseList with `tail=hidden/collapsed`.
2025-07-30 09:55:09 -04:00
Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann
36c63d4f9c [DevTools] Layout for Suspense tab (#34042) 2025-07-30 07:12:18 +02:00
Joseph Savona
88b40f6e41 Enable ref validation in linter (#34044)
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34044).
* #34027
* __->__ #34044
2025-07-29 12:30:29 -07:00
Joseph Savona
04a7a61918 [compiler] Allow assigning ref-accessing functions to objects if not mutated (#34026)
Allows assigning a ref-accessing function to an object so long as that
object is not subsequently transitively mutated. We should likely
rewrite the ref validation to use the new mutation/aliasing effects,
which would provide a more consistent behavior across instruction types
and require fewer special cases like this.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34026).
* #34027
* __->__ #34026
2025-07-29 10:57:26 -07:00
Joseph Savona
c2326b1336 [compiler] disallow ref access in state initializer, reducer/initializer (#34025)
Per title, disallow ref access in `useState()` initializer function,
`useReducer()` reducer, and `useReducer()` init function.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34025).
* #34027
* #34026
* __->__ #34025
2025-07-29 10:56:04 -07:00
Joseph Savona
4395689980 [compiler] ref guards apply up to fallthrough of the test (#34024)
Fixes #30782

When developers do an `if (ref.current == null)` guard for lazy ref
initialization, the "safe" blocks should extend up to the if's
fallthrough. Previously we only allowed writing to the ref in the if
consequent, but this meant that you couldn't use a ternary, logical, etc
in the if body.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34024).
* #34027
* #34026
* #34025
* __->__ #34024
2025-07-29 10:53:13 -07:00
Joseph Savona
6891dcb87d [compiler] treat ref-like identifiers as refs by default (#34005)
`@enableTreatRefLikeIdentifiersAsRefs` is now on by default. I made one
small fix to the render helper logic as part of this, uncovered by
including more tests.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34005).
* #34027
* #34026
* #34025
* #34024
* __->__ #34005
2025-07-29 10:51:10 -07:00
Joseph Savona
3f40eb73a8 [compiler] Allow passing refs to render helpers (#34006)
We infer render helpers as functions whose result is immediately
interpolated into jsx. This is a very conservative approximation, to
help with common cases like `<Foo>{props.renderItem(ref)}</Foo>`. The
idea is similar to hooks that it's ultimately on the developer to catch
ref-in-render validations (and the runtime detects them too), so we can
be a bit more relaxed since there are valid reasons to use this pattern.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34006).
* #34027
* #34026
* #34025
* #34024
* #34005
* __->__ #34006
* #34004
2025-07-29 10:06:23 -07:00
Joseph Savona
1d7e942da7 [compiler] Allow mergeRefs pattern (and detect refs passed as ref prop) (#34004)
Two related changes:
* ValidateNoRefAccessInRender now allows the mergeRefs pattern, ie a
function that aggregates multiple refs into a new ref. This is the main
case where we have seen false positive no-ref-in-render errors.
* Behind `@enableTreatRefLikeIdentifiersAsRefs`, we infer values passed
as the `ref` prop to some JSX as refs.

The second change is potentially helpful for situations such as

```js
function Component({ref: parentRef}) {
  const childRef = useRef(null);
  const mergedRef = mergeRefs(parentRef, childRef);
  useEffect(() => {
    // generally accesses childRef, not mergedRef
  }, []);
  return <Foo ref={mergedRef} />;
}
```

Ie where you create a merged ref but don't access its `.current`
property. Without inferring `ref` props as refs, we'd fail to allow this
merge refs case.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34004).
* #34027
* #34026
* #34025
* #34024
* #34005
* #34006
* __->__ #34004
2025-07-29 10:06:11 -07:00
Joseph Savona
79dc706498 [compiler] Improve ref validation error message (#34003)
Improves the error message for ValidateNoRefAccessInRender, using the
new diagnostic type as well as providing a longer but succinct summary
of what refs are for and why they're unsafe to access in render.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34003).
* #34027
* #34026
* #34025
* #34024
* #34005
* #34006
* #34004
* __->__ #34003
2025-07-29 10:03:28 -07:00
Joseph Savona
85bbe39ef8 [compiler] Fixes to enableTreatRefLikeIdentifiersAsRefs (#34000)
We added the `@enableTreatRefLikeIdentifiersAsRefs` feature a while back
but never enabled it. Since then we've continued to see examples that
motivate this mode, so here we're fixing it up to prepare to enable by
default. It now works as follows:

* If we find a property load or property store where both a) the
object's name is ref-like (`ref` or `-Ref`) and b) the property is
`current`, we infer the object itself as a ref and the value of the
property as a ref value. Originally the feature only detected property
loads, not stores.
* Inferred refs are not considered stable (this is a change from the
original implementation). The only way to get a stable ref is by calling
`useRef()`. We've seen issues with assuming refs are stable.

With this change, cases like the following now correctly error:

```js
function Foo(props) {
  const fooRef = props.fooRef;
  fooRef.current = true;
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot modify ref in render
}
```

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34000).
* #34027
* #34026
* #34025
* #34024
* #34005
* #34006
* #34004
* #34003
* __->__ #34000
2025-07-29 09:57:48 -07:00
lauren
820af20971 [eslint] Disallow use within try/catch blocks (#34040)
Follow up to #34032. The linter now ensures that `use` cannot be used
within try/catch.
2025-07-29 12:33:42 -04:00
Sebastian Markbåge
9be531cd37 [Fiber] Treat unwrapping React.lazy more like a use() (#34031)
While we want to get rid of React.lazy's special wrapper type and just
use a Promise for the type, we still have the wrapper.

However, this is still conceptually the same as a Usable in that it
should be have the same if you `use(promise)` or render a Promise as a
child or type position.

This PR makes it behave like a `use()` when we unwrap them. We could
move to a model where it actually reaches the internal of the Lazy's
Promise when it unwraps but for now I leave the lazy API signature
intact by just catching the Promise and then "use()" that.

This lets us align on the semantics with `use()` such as the suspense
yield optimization. It also lets us warn or fork based on legacy
throw-a-Promise behavior where as `React.lazy` is not deprecated.
2025-07-29 11:50:12 -04:00
Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann
b1cbb482d5 [DevTools] More robust resize handling (#34036) 2025-07-29 17:45:00 +02:00
Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann
9c9136b441 [DevTools] Swap Components tab layout based on container size (#34035) 2025-07-29 17:23:35 +02:00
Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann
33a2bf78c4 [DevTools] Silence unactionable bundle warnings in shell (#34034) 2025-07-29 11:18:47 +02:00
Sebastian Markbåge
5d7e8b90e2 [DevTools] Use use() instead of throwing a Promise in Caches (#34033) 2025-07-29 03:45:56 -04:00
Sebastian Markbåge
71236c9409 [DevTools] Include the description derived from the promise (#34017)
Stacked on #34016.

This is using the same thing we already do for the performance track to
provide a description of the I/O based on the content of the resolved
Promise. E.g. a Response's URL.

<img width="375" height="388" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-28 at 1 09 49 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f3fdc40f-4e21-4e83-b49e-21c7ec975137"
/>
2025-07-28 15:11:04 -04:00
lauren
7ee7571212 [compiler] Enable validateNoVoidUseMemo in eslint & playground (#34022)
Enables `validateNoVoidUseMemo` by default only in eslint (it defaults
to false otherwise) as well as the playground.
2025-07-28 13:42:14 -04:00
lauren
6b22f31f1a [compiler] Aggregate all errors reported from DropManualMemoization (#34002)
Noticed this from my previous PR that this pass was throwing on the
first error. This PR is a small refactor to aggregate every violation
and report them all at once.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34002).
* #34022
* __->__ #34002
2025-07-28 13:25:25 -04:00
lauren
b5c1637109 [compiler] Reuse DropManualMemoization for ValidateNoVoidUseMemo (#34001)
Much of the logic in the new validation pass is already implemented in
DropManualMemoization, so let's combine them. I opted to keep the
environment flag so we can more precisely control the rollout.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34001).
* #34022
* #34002
* __->__ #34001
2025-07-28 12:54:43 -04:00
lauren
c60eebffea [compiler] Add new ValidateNoVoidUseMemo pass (#33990)
Adds a new validation pass to validate against `useMemo`s that don't
return anything. This usually indicates some kind of "useEffect"-like
code that has side effects that need to be memoized to prevent
overfiring, and is an anti-pattern.

A follow up validation could also look at the return value of `useMemo`s
to see if they are being used.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33990).
* #34022
* #34002
* #34001
* __->__ #33990
* #33989
2025-07-28 12:46:42 -04:00
lauren
5dd622eabe [compiler] Disambiguate between void, implicit, and explicit returns (#33989)
Adds a new property to ReturnTerminals to disambiguate whether it was
explicit, implicit (arrow function expressions), or void (where it was
omitted). I will use this property in the next PR adding a new
validation pass.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33989).
* #34022
* #34002
* #34001
* #33990
* __->__ #33989
2025-07-28 12:46:30 -04:00
dan
904989f044 Clean up 19.1.1 changelog (#34023)
See
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/34021#issuecomment-3128006800.

The purpose of the changelog is to communicate to React users what
changed in the release.

Therefore, it is important that the changelog is written oriented
towards React end users. Historically this means that we omit
internal-only changes, i.e. changes that have no effect on the end user
behavior. If internal changes are mentioned in the changelog (e.g. if
they affect end user behavior), they should be phrased in a way that is
understandable to the end user — in particular, they should not refer to
internal API names or concepts.

We also try to group changes according to the publicly known packages.

In this PR:

- Make #33680 an actual link (otherwise it isn't linkified in
CHANGELOG.md on GitHub).
- Remove two changelog entries listed under "React" that don't affect
anyone who upgrades the "React" package, that are phrased using
terminology and internal function names unfamiliar to React users, and
that seem to be RN-specific changes (so should probably go into the RN
changelog that goes out with the next renderer sync that includes these
changes).
2025-07-28 17:32:23 +01:00
Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann
ab2681af03 [DevTools] Skeleton for Suspense tab (#34020) 2025-07-28 18:26:55 +02:00
Sebastian Markbåge
101b20b663 [DevTools] Add a little bar indicating time span of an async entry relative to others (#34016)
Stacked on #34012.

This shows a time track for when some I/O started and when it finished
relative to other I/O in the same component (or later in the same
suspense boundary).

This is not meant to be a precise visualization since the data might be
misleading if you're running this in dev which has other perf
characteristics anyway. It's just meant to be a general way to orient
yourself in the data.

We can also highlight rejected promises here.

The color scheme is the same as Chrome's current Performance Track
colors to add continuity but those could change.

<img width="478" height="480" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-27 at 11 48 03 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/545dd591-a91f-4c47-be96-41d80f09a94a"
/>
2025-07-28 12:22:33 -04:00
Jack Pope
eaee5308cc Add changelog entry for 19.1.1 (#34021)
Add changelog details matching release notes:
https://github.com/facebook/react/releases/tag/v19.1.1
2025-07-28 12:09:56 -04:00
Sebastian Markbåge
4a58b63865 [DevTools] Add "suspended by" Section to Component Inspector Sidebar (#34012)
This collects the ReactAsyncInfo between instances. It associates it
with the parent. Typically this would be a Server Component's Promise
return value but it can also be Promises in a fragment. It can also be
associated with a client component when you pass a Promise into the
child position e.g. `<div>{promise}</div>` then it's associated with the
div. If an instance is filtered, then it gets associated with the parent
of that's unfiltered.

The stack trace currently isn't source mapped. I'll do that in a follow
up.

We also need to add a "short name" from the Promise for the description
(e.g. url). I'll also add a little marker showing the relative time span
of each entry.

<img width="447" height="591" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-26 at 7 56 00 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7c966540-7b1b-4568-8cb9-f25cefd5a918"
/>
<img width="446" height="570" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-26 at 7 55 23 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4eac235b-e735-41e8-9c6e-a7633af64e4b"
/>
2025-07-28 12:05:56 -04:00
Hiroshi Ogawa
cc015840ef fix: React.use inside React.lazy-ed component on SSR (#33941) 2025-07-28 10:36:08 +02:00
Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann
19baee813c [Runtime] Fix CI (#33999) 2025-07-25 21:04:35 +02:00
Joseph Savona
2aa5f9d4e3 [compiler] fix false positive "mutate frozen" validation with refs (#33993)
The test case here previously reported a "Cannot modify local variables
after render completes" error (from
ValidateNoFreezingKnownMutableFunctions). This happens because one of
the functions passed to a hook clearly mutates a ref — except that we
try to ignore mutations of refs! The problem in this case is that the
`const ref = ...` was getting converted to a context variable since the
ref is accessed in a function before its declaration. We don't infer
types for context variables at all, and our ref handling is based on
types, so we failed to ignore this ref mutation.

The fix is to recognize that `StoreLocal const ...` is a special case:
the variable may be referenced in code before the declaration, but at
runtime it's either a TDZ error or the variable will have the type from
the declaration. So we can safely infer a type.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33993).
* __->__ #33993
* #33991
* #33984
2025-07-25 10:08:09 -07:00
Joseph Savona
8c587a2a41 [compiler] clarify text for setState-in-effect error (#33991)
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33991).
* #33993
* __->__ #33991
* #33984
2025-07-25 10:07:55 -07:00
Joseph Savona
12483a119b [compiler] Fix for edge cases of mutation of potentially frozen values (#33984)
Fixes two related cases of mutation of potentially frozen values.

The first is method calls on frozen values. Previously, we modeled
unknown function calls as potentially aliasing their receiver+args into
the return value. If the receiver or argument were known to be frozen,
then we would downgrade the `Alias` effect into an `ImmutableCapture`.
However, within a function expression it's possible to call a function
using a frozen value as an argument (that gets `Alias`-ed into the
return) but where we don't have the context locally to know that the
value is frozen.

This results in cases like this:

```js
const frozen = useContext(...);
useEffect(() => {
  frozen.method().property = true;
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot mutate frozen value
}, [...]);
```

Within the function we would infer:

```
t0 = MethodCall ...
  Create t0 = mutable
  Alias t0 <- frozen
t1 = PropertyStore ...
  Mutate t0
```

And then transitively infer the function expression as having a `Mutate
'frozen'` effect, which when evaluated against the outer context
(`frozen` is frozen) is an error.

The fix is to model unknown function calls as _maybe_ aliasing their
receiver/args in the return, and then considering mutations of a
maybe-aliased value to only be a conditional mutation of the source:


```
t0 = MethodCall ...
  Create t0 = mutable
  MaybeAlias t0 <- frozen // maybe alias now
t1 = PropertyStore ...
  Mutate t0
```

Then, the `Mutate t0` turns into a `MutateConditional 'frozen'`, which
just gets ignored when we process the outer context.

The second, related fix is for known mutation of phis that may be a
frozen value. The previous inference model correctly recorded these as
errors, the new model does not. We now correctly report a validation
error for this case in the new model.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33984).
* #33993
* #33991
* __->__ #33984
2025-07-25 10:07:24 -07:00
Sebastian Markbåge
b2c30493ce [DevTools] Use the hard coded url instead of the local storage url for presets (and make VSCode default) (#33995)
Stacked on #33983.

Previously, the source of truth is the url stored in local storage but
that means if we change the presets then they don't take effect (e.g.
#33994). This PR uses the hardcoded value instead when a preset is
selected.

This also has the benefit that if you switch between custom and vs code
in the selector, then the custom url is preserved instead of getting
reset when you checkout other options.

Currently the default is custom with empty string, which means that
there's no code editor configured at all by default. It doesn't make a
lot of sense that we have it not working by default when so many people
use VS Code. So this also makes VS Code the default if there's no
EDITOR_URL env specified.
2025-07-25 10:27:27 -04:00
Sebastian Markbåge
36c2bf5c3e [DevTools] Allow all file links in Chrome DevTools to open in external editor (#33985)
Stacked on #33983.

Allow React to be configured as the default handler of all links in
Chrome DevTools. To do this you need to configure the Chrome DevTools
setting for "Link Handling:" to be set to "React Developer Tools". By
default this doesn't do anything but if you then check the box added in
#33983 it starts open local files directly in the external editor.

This needs docs to show how to enable that option.

(As far as I can tell this broke in Chrome Canary 🙄 but hopefully fixed
before stable.)
2025-07-25 10:27:09 -04:00