* Component Lifecycle In Depth documentation
* first steps to improve react component reference
* improved react component reference
- remove the component-lifecycle-in-depth
* add a note for usage of ReactDOM.findDOMNode
* one note on componentWillReceiveProps
* remove old useless images for lifecycle docs
* Tweak wording
- In the previous example, the code works even without using bind(this) in the constructor.
- the reason being handleClick doesn't even use `this` and its just calling the global function alert.
- this change make use of this via access this.state.
My first contribution to React!
While upgrading a React project, I found some suspect SVG that needed updating, so I dug in after checking the docs. I knew that support for some SVG properties had been added (namely `xmlns` and `xmlnsXlink`), but I noticed them missing from the reference's attribute list. This pull request updates `reference-dom-elements.md` by adding said properties.
Only declare the variable once in this scope, instead of declaring them multiple times in the same scope.
This fixes#8318, even though it might technically be a shortcoming in Rollup.
Showing how to create a form without labeling inputs is an accessibility anti-pattern. This change adds labels to the examples to address that. Codepen may still need to be updated depending on how that example is created.
* Update tutorial.md
Is it possible to be more clear here?
This implies that we are removing the constructor from GAME, and not board (which is what I believe the author is trying to say).
It took me several reads to understand.
With this edit, it is now clear that the adjustment is being made to -Board- and not to -Game-
* also remove "for Board earlier"
* Remove spread operator
I believe what was meant here was to express that you would create the new player object with all the previous properties of the existing player object in addition to now updating the score value. That being said, this is a simple example, and the player object clearly has no other values. Objects are not (by default) iterable using this operator, so this little piece does more harm than good. I believe the new example to be much clearer.
* Using Object.assign()
* Tweak wording
