Adding getter-functions for renderer implementations, which can be used
for jest tests. If we are testing against React with version < 18, we
are going to use legacy rendering, otherwise the concurrent one.
- Moving `act` implementation to a single getter-function, which is
based on React version we are testing RDT against.
- Removing unused mocks for `act`, which were designed for legacy
versions of React, validated with running tests against React 16 build.
Starting in version 19, users can import the `act` testing API from the
`react` package instead of using a renderer specific API, like
`react-dom/test-utils`.
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/27805 broke integration tests for
React DevTools with React 17, these changes introduce a fallback for
such case when `act` is not available in `react`, but available in
`react-dom`, like before.
## Summary
Concurrent rendering has been the default since React 18 release.
ReactTestRenderer requires passing `{unstable_isConcurrent: true}` to
match this behavior, which means by default tests written with RTR use a
different rendering method than the code they test.
Eventually, RTR should only use ConcurrentRoot. As a first step, let's
add a version of the concurrent option that isn't marked unstable. Next
we will follow up with removing the unstable option when it is safe to
merge.
## How did you test this change?
`yarn test
packages/react-test-renderer/src/__tests__/ReactTestRendererAsync-test.js`
As part of the process of removing the deprecated `react-dom/test-utils`
package references to `act` from this module are replaced with
references to `unstable_act` in `react`. It is likely that the unstable
act implementation will be made stable. The test utils act is just a
reexport of the unstable_act implementation in react itself.
Adds `Forget` badge to all relevant components.
Changes:
- If component is compiled with Forget and using a built-in
`useMemoCache` hook, it will have a `Forget` badge next to its display
name in:
- components tree
- inspected element view
- owners list
- Such badges are indexable, so Forget components can be searched using
search bar.
Fixes:
- Displaying the badges for owners list inside the inspected component
view
Implementation:
- React DevTools backend is responsible for identifying if component is
compiled with Forget, based on `fiber.updateQueue.memoCache`. It will
wrap component's display name with `Forget(...)` prefix before passing
operations to the frontend. On the frontend side, we will parse the
display name and strip Forget prefix, marking the corresponding element
by setting `compiledWithForget` field. Almost the same logic is
currently used for HOC display names.
Updates useFormState to allow a sync function to be passed as an action.
A form action is almost always async, because it needs to talk to the
server. But since we support client-side actions, too, there's no reason
we can't allow sync actions, too.
I originally chose not to allow them to keep the implementation simpler
but it's not really that much more complicated because we already
support this for actions passed to startTransition. So now it's
consistent: anywhere an action is accepted, a sync client function is a
valid input.
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
Updated the typo in test description
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
## How did you test this change?
NA, correct test description improves readability of the code and
confusion for anyone who is new to the codebase.
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
### Based on https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/27505
If a parent render spawns a deferred task with useDeferredValue, but the
parent render suspends, we should not wait for the parent render to
complete before attempting to render the final value.
The reason is that the initialValue argument to useDeferredValue is
meant to represent an immediate preview of the final UI. If we can't
render it "immediately", we might as well skip it and go straight to the
"real" value.
This is an improvement over how a userspace implementation of
useDeferredValue would work, because a userspace implementation would
have to wait for the parent task to commit (useEffect) before spawning
the deferred task, creating a waterfall.
There are not so many changes, most of them are changing imports,
because I've moved types for UI in a single file.
In https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/27357 I've added support for
pausing polling events: when user inspects an element, we start polling
React DevTools backend for updates in props / state. If user switches
tabs, extension's service worker can be killed by browser and this
polling will start spamming errors.
What I've missed is that we also have a separate call for this API, but
which is executed only once when user selects an element. We don't
handle promise rejection here and this can lead to some errors when user
selects an element and switches tabs right after it.
The only change here is that this API now has
`shouldListenToPauseEvents` param, which is `true` for polling, so we
will pause polling once user switches tabs. It is `false` by default, so
we won't pause initial call by accident.
af8beeebf6/packages/react-devtools-shared/src/backendAPI.js (L96)
Some context:
- When user selects an element in tree inspector, we display current
state of the component. In order to display really current state, we
start polling the backend to get available updates for the element.
Previously:
- Straight-forward sending an event to get element updates each second.
Potential race condition is not handled in any form.
- If user navigates from the page, timeout wouldn't be cleared and we
would potentially throw "Timed out ..." error.
- Bridge disconnection is not handled in any form, if it was shut down,
we could spam with "Timed out ..." errors.
With these changes:
- Requests are now chained, so there can be a single request at a time.
- Handling both navigation and shut down events.
This should reduce the number of "Timed out ..." errors that we see in
our logs for the extension. Other surfaces will also benefit from it,
but not to the full extent, as long as they utilize
"resumeElementPolling" and "pauseElementPolling" events.
Tested this on Chrome, running React DevTools on multiple tabs,
explicitly checked the case when service worker is in idle state and we
return back to the tab.
## Summary
as we began [discussing
yesterday](https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/27056#discussion_r1253282784),
`SuspenseList` is not actually stable yet, and should likely be exported
with the `unstable_` prefix.
the conversation yesterday began discussing this in the context of the
fb-specific packages, but changing it there without updating everywhere
else leads to test failures, so here the change is made across packages.
## How did you test this change?
```
yarn flow dom-browser
yarn test
```
## Summary
Running `yarn test --project devtools --build` currently skips all
non-gated (without `@reactVersion` directives) devtools tests. This is
not expected behaviour, these changes are fixing it.
There were multiple related PRs to it:
- https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/26742
- https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/25712
- https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/24555
With these changes, the resulting behaviour will be:
- If `REACT_VERSION` env variable is specified:
- jest will not include all non-gated test cases in the test run
- jest will run only a specific test case, when specified
`REACT_VERSION` value satisfies the range defined by `@reactVersion`
directives for this test case
- If `REACT_VERSION` env variable is not specified, jest will run all
non-gated tests:
- jest will include all non-gated test cases in the test run
- jest will run all non-gated test cases, the only skipped test cases
will be those, which specified the range that does not include the next
stable version of react, which will be imported from `ReactVersions.js`
## How did you test this change?
Running `profilingCache` test suite without specifying `reactVersion`
now skips gated (>= 17 & < 18) test
<img width="1447" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-15 at 11 18 22"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/28902667/cad58994-2cb3-44b3-9eb2-1699c01a1eb3">
Running `profilingCache` test suite with specifying `reactVersion` to
`17` now runs this test case and skips others correctly
<img width="1447" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-15 at 11 20 11"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/28902667/d308960a-c172-4422-ba6f-9c0dbcd6f7d5">
Running `yarn test --project devtools ...` without specifying
`reactVersion` now runs all non-gated test cases
<img width="398" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-15 at 12 25 12"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/28902667/2b329634-0efd-4c4c-b460-889696bbc9e1">
Running `yarn test --project devtools ...` with specifying
`reactVersion` (to `17` in this example) now includes only gated tests
<img width="414" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-15 at 12 26 31"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/28902667/a702c27e-4c35-4b12-834c-e5bb06728997">
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn debug-test --watch TestName`, open
`chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
Fix devtools cannot be shutdown by bridge.shutdown().
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
This adds an experimental hook tentatively called useOptimisticState.
(The actual name needs some bikeshedding.)
The headline feature is that you can use it to implement optimistic
updates. If you set some optimistic state during a transition/action,
the state will be automatically reverted once the transition completes.
Another feature is that the optimistic updates will be continually
rebased on top of the latest state.
It's easiest to explain with examples; we'll publish documentation as
the API gets closer to stabilizing. See tests for now.
Technically the use cases for this hook are broader than just optimistic
updates; you could use it implement any sort of "pending" state, such as
the ones exposed by useTransition and useFormStatus. But we expect
people will most often reach for this hook to implement the optimistic
update pattern; simpler cases are covered by those other hooks.
This test started failing recently in older versions of React because
the Scheduler priority inside a microtask is Normal instead of
Immediate. This is expected because microtasks are not Scheduler tasks;
it's an implementation detail.
I gated the test to only run in v17 because it's a regression test for
legacy Suspense behavior, and the implementation details of the snapshot
changed in v18.
Test plan
---------
Using latest:
```
yarn test --build --project devtools --release-channel=experimental profilingcache
```
Using v17 (typically runs in a timed CI workflow):
```
/scripts/circleci/download_devtools_regression_build.js 17.0 --replaceBuild
yarn test --build --project devtools --release-channel=experimental --reactVersion 17.0 profilingcache
```
- substr is Annex B
- substring silently flips its arguments if they're in the "wrong order", which is confusing
- slice is better than sliced bread (no pun intended) and also it works the same way on Arrays so there's less to remember
---
> I'd be down to just lint and enforce a single form just for the potential compression savings by using a repeated string.
_Originally posted by @sebmarkbage in https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/26663#discussion_r1170455401_
Fixes https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/26500
## Summary
- No more using `clipboard-js` from the backend side, now emitting
custom `saveToClipboard` event, also adding corresponding listener in
`store.js`
- Not migrating to `navigator.clipboard` api yet, there were some issues
with using it on Chrome, will add more details to
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/26539
## How did you test this change?
- Tested on Chrome, Firefox, Edge
- Tested on standalone electron app: seems like context menu is not
expected to work there (cannot right-click on value, the menu is not
appearing), other logic (pressing on copy icon) was not changed
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/24781
Restricting from editing props, which are class instances, because their
internals should be opaque.
Proposed changes:
1. Adding new data type `class_instance`: based on prototype chain of an
object we will check if its plain or not. If not, then will be marked as
`class_instance`. This should not affect `arrays`, ..., because we do
this in the end of an `object` case in `getDataType` function.
Important detail: this approach won't work for objects created with
`Object.create`, because of the custom prototype. This can also be
bypassed by manually deleting a prototype ¯\\\_(ツ)_/¯
I am not sure if there might be a better solution (which will cover all
cases) to detect if object is a class instance. Initially I was trying
to use `Object.getPrototypeOf(object) === Object.prototype`, but this
won't work for cases when we are dealing with `iframe`.
2. Objects with a type `class_instance` will be marked as unserializable
and read-only.
## Demo
`person` is a class instance, `object` is a plain object
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/28902667/228914791-ebdc8ab0-eb5c-426d-8163-66d56b5e8790.mov
When React receives new input (via `setState`, a Suspense promise
resolution, and so on), it needs to ensure there's a rendering task
associated with the update. Most of this happens
`ensureRootIsScheduled`.
If a single event contains multiple updates, we end up running the
scheduling code once per update. But this is wasteful because we really
only need to run it once, at the end of the event (or in the case of
flushSync, at the end of the scope function's execution).
So this PR moves the scheduling logic to happen in a microtask instead.
In some cases, we will force it run earlier than that, like for
`flushSync`, but since updates are batched by default, it will almost
always happen in the microtask. Even for discrete updates.
In production, this should have no observable behavior difference. In a
testing environment that uses `act`, this should also not have a
behavior difference because React will push these tasks to an internal
`act` queue.
However, tests that do not use `act` and do not simulate an actual
production environment (like an e2e test) may be affected. For example,
before this change, if a test were to call `setState` outside of `act`
and then immediately call `jest.runAllTimers()`, the update would be
synchronously applied. After this change, that will no longer work
because the rendering task (a timer, in this case) isn't scheduled until
after the microtask queue has run.
I don't expect this to be an issue in practice because most people do
not write their tests this way. They either use `act`, or they write
e2e-style tests.
The biggest exception has been... our own internal test suite. Until
recently, many of our tests were written in a way that accidentally
relied on the updates being scheduled synchronously. Over the past few
weeks, @tyao1 and I have gradually converted the test suite to use a new
set of testing helpers that are resilient to this implementation detail.
(There are also some old Relay tests that were written in the style of
React's internal test suite. Those will need to be fixed, too.)
The larger motivation behind this change, aside from a minor performance
improvement, is we intend to use this new microtask to perform
additional logic that doesn't yet exist. Like inferring the priority of
a custom event.
Added an explicit type to all $FlowFixMe suppressions to reduce
over-suppressions of new errors that might be caused on the same lines.
Also removes suppressions that aren't used (e.g. in a `@noflow` file as
they're purely misleading)
Test Plan:
yarn flow-ci
For various reasons some of the DevTools e2e tests uses our repo's
private internal version of `act`. It should really just be using the
public one.
This converts one of the usages, because it was causing CI to fail.
This adds an async gap to our internal implementation of `act` (the one
used by our repo, not the public API). Rather than call the provided
scope function synchronously when `act` is called, we call it in a
separate async task. This is an extra precaution to ensure that our
tests do not accidentally rely on work being queued synchronously,
because that is an implementation detail that we should be allowed to
change. We don't do this in the public version of `act`, though we maybe
should in the future, for the same rationale. That might be tricky,
though, because it could break existing tests.
This also fixes the issue where our internal `act` requires an async
function. You can pass it a regular function, too.
This is not a public API. We only use it for our internal tests, the
ones in this repo. Let's move it to this private package. Practically
speaking this will also let us use async/await in the implementation.
Similar to the rationale for `waitFor` (see #26285), we should always
await the result of an `act` call so that microtasks have a chance to
fire.
This only affects the internal `act` that we use in our repo, for now.
In the public `act` API, we don't yet require this; however, we
effectively will for any update that triggers suspense once `use` lands.
So we likely will start warning in an upcoming minor.
(This only affects our own internal repo; it's not a public API.)
I think most of us agree this is a less confusing name. It's possible
someone will confuse it with `console.log`. If that becomes a problem we
can warn in dev or something.
This converts some of our test suite to use the `waitFor` test pattern,
instead of the `expect(Scheduler).toFlushAndYield` pattern. Most of
these changes are automated with jscodeshift, with some slight manual
cleanup in certain cases.
See #26285 for full context.
This converts some of our test suite to use the `waitFor` test pattern,
instead of the `expect(Scheduler).toFlushAndYield` pattern. Most of
these changes are automated with jscodeshift, with some slight manual
cleanup in certain cases.
See #26285 for full context.
