When owner and self are different for string refs, we can't easily convert them to callback refs. This PR adds a warning for string refs when owner and self are different to tell users to manually update these refs.
* Update Flow to 0.84
* Fix violations
* Use inexact object syntax in files from fbsource
* Fix warning extraction to use a modern parser
* Codemod inexact objects to new syntax
* Tighten types that can be exact
* Revert unintentional formatting changes from codemod
* Remove toString of dangerouslySetInnerHTML
As far as I can tell, the toString call was added here:
caae627cd5 (diff-5574f655d491348f422bca600ff6711dR887)
It was never really needed. Subsequently when we added Trusted Types,
this needed to be changed to a special call but we really should just
always let it pass through.
* Remove special casing of toString values when enableTrustedTypesIntegration
As far as I can tell, we only toString in user space because of IE8/9.
We don't really support IE8/9 anymore and by the time this flag is on,
we should be able to deprecate it.
Unless this is also an issue in IE11. I haven't tested yet.
As far as I can tell, the toString call was added here:
caae627cd5 (diff-5574f655d491348f422bca600ff6711dR887)
It was never really needed. Subsequently when we added Trusted Types,
this needed to be changed to a special call but we really should just
always let it pass through.
* Replace all warning/lowPriWarning with console calls
* Replace console.warn/error with a custom wrapper at build time
* Fail the build for console.error/warn() where we can't read the stack
* prep for codemod
* prep warnings
* rename lint rules
* codemod for ifs
* shim www functions
* Handle more cases in the transform
* Thanks De Morgan
* Run the codemod
* Delete the transform
* Fix up confusing conditions manually
* Fix up www shims to match expected API
* Also check for low-pri warning in the lint rule
* Replace Babel plugin with an ESLint plugin
* Fix ESLint rule violations
* Move shared conditions higher
* Test formatting nits
* Tweak ESLint rule
* Bugfix: inside else branch, 'if' tests are not satisfactory
* Use a stricter check for exactly if (__DEV__)
This makes it easier to see what's going on and matches dominant style in the codebase.
* Fix remaining files after stricter check
* Move Flight DOM to Webpack Specific Packagee
We'll have Webpack specific coupling so we need to ensure that it can be
versioned separately from various Webpack versions. We'll also have builds
for other bundlers in the future.
* Move to peerDep
* Move DOM Flight Tests
* Merge ReactFlightIntegration into ReactFlightDOM
This was an integration test. We can add to it.
* Fix fixture paths
* Regression test: Effects dropped across roots
See #17066
* [Bugfix] Passive effects loop
The bug
-------
In a multi-root app, certain passive effects (`useEffect`) are never
fired. See #17066.
The underlying problem
----------------------
The implicit contract of `flushPassiveEffects` is that, right after
calling it, there should be no pending passive effects. In the normal
case, in concurrent mode, this is true. But the current implementation
fails to account for the case where a passive effect schedules
synchronous work, which in turn schedules additional passive effects.
This led to `rootWithPendingPassiveEffects` being overwritten in the
commit phase, because an assignment that assumed it was replacing null
was actually replacing a reference to another root, which has the
consequence of dropping passive effects on that root.
The fix
-------
The fix I've chosen here is, at the beginning of the commit phase, keep
flushing passive effects in a loop until there are no more.
This doesn't not change the "public" implementation of
`flushPassiveEffects`, though it arguably should work this way, too. I
say "public" because it's only used by implementation layers on top of
React which we control: mainly, the legacy version of `act` that does
not use the mock Scheduler build. So there's probably still a bug
in that `act` implementation.
I will address `act` in a follow-up. The ideal solution is to replace
the legacy `act` with one implemented directly in the renderer, using a
special testing-only build of React DOM. Since that requires a breaking
change, we'll need an interim solution. We could make the "public" `act`
recursively flush effects in a loop, as I've done for the commit phase.
However, I think a better solution is to stop automatically flushing the
synchronous update queue at the end of `flushPassiveEffects`, and
instead require the caller to explicitly call `flushSyncUpdateQueue` (or
the equivalent) if needed. This follows the same pattern we use
internally in the work loop, which is designed to avoid factoring
hazards like the one that resulted in this bug.
* Unify fields used for createRoot warning and event system
* Warn when doing createRoot twice on the same node
* Stricter check for modern roots
* Unmark asynchronously
* Fix Flow
* [Flight] Basic Integration Test
* Just act()
* Lint
* Remove unnecessary acts
* Use Concurrent Mode
* it.experimental
* Fix prod test by advancing time
* Don't observe initial state
* Return whether to keep flowing in Host config
* Emit basic chunk based streaming in the Flight server
When something suspends a new chunk is created.
* Add reentrancy check
The WHATWG API is designed to be pulled recursively.
We should refactor to favor that approach.
* Basic streaming Suspense support on the client
* Add basic suspense in example
* Add comment describing the protocol that the server generates
* Rename ReactFlightStreamer -> ReactFlightServer
* Unify Browser/Node stream tests into one file and use the client reader
* Defer to the actual ReactDOM for HTML rendering for now
This will need to use a variant of Fizz to do inline SSR in Flight.
However, I don't want to build the whole impl right now but also don't
want to exclude the use case yet. So I outsource it to the existing
renderer. Ofc, this doesn't work with Suspense atm.
* Change demo to server
* Expose client in package.json
* Reorganize tests
We don't want unit tests but instead test how both server and clients work
together. So this merges server/client test files.
* Fill in the client implementation a bit
* Use new client in fixture
* Add Promise/Uint8Array to lint rule
I'll probably end up deleting these deps later but they're here for now.
`it.experimental` marks that a test only works in Experimental builds.
It also asserts that a test does *not* work in the stable builds. The
main benefit is that we're less likely to accidentally expose an
experimental API before we intend. It also forces us to un- mark an
experimental test once it become stable.
* Add Flight Build and Unify HostFormat Config between Flight and Fizz
* Add basic resolution of models
* Add basic Flight fixture
Demonstrates the streaming protocol.
* Rename to flight-server to distinguish from the client parts
* Add Flight Client package and entry point
* Fix fixture
Special version of Jest's `it` for experimental tests. Tests marked as
experimental will run **both** stable and experimental modes. In
experimental mode, they work the same as the normal Jest methods. In
stable mode, they are **expected to fail**. This means we can detect
when a test previously marked as experimental can be un-marked when the
feature becomes stable. It also reduces the chances that we accidentally
add experimental APIs to the stable builds before we intend.
I added corresponding methods for the focus and skip APIs:
- `fit` -> `fit.experimental`
- `it.only` -> `it.only.experimental` or `it.experimental.only`
- `xit` -> `xit.experimental`
- `it.skip` -> `it.skip.experimental` or `it.experimental.skip`
Since `it` is an alias of `test`, `test.experimental` works, too.
Without the enableSuspenseServerRenderer flag there will never be a boundary match. Also when it is enabled, there might not be a boundary match if something was conditionally rendered by mistake.
With this PR it will now client render the content of a Suspense boundary in that case and issue a DEV only hydration warning. This is the only sound semantics for this case.
Unfortunately, landing this will once again break #16938. It will be less bad though because at least it'll just work by client rendering the content instead of hydrating and issue a DEV only warning.
However, we must land this before enabling the enableSuspenseServerRenderer flag since it does this anyway.
I did notice that we special case fallback={undefined} due to our unfortunate semantics for that. So technically a workaround that works is actually setting the fallback to undefined on the server and during hydration. Then flip it on only after hydration. That could be a workaround if you want to be able to have a Suspense boundary work only after hydration for some reason.
It's kind of unfortunate but at least those semantics are internally consistent. So I added a test for that.
