* ReactFiberReconciler -> ReactFiberReconciler.old
* Set up infra for react-reconciler fork
We're planning to land some significant refactors of the reconciler.
We want to be able to gradually roll out the new implementation side-by-
side with the existing one. So we'll create a short lived fork of the
react-reconciler package. Once the new implementation has stabilized,
we'll delete the old implementation and promote the new one.
This means, for as long as the fork exists, we'll need to maintain two
separate implementations. This sounds painful, but since the forks will
still be largely the same, most changes will not require two separate
implementations. In practice, you'll implement the change in the old
fork and then copy paste it to the new one.
This commit only sets up the build and testing infrastructure. It does
not actually fork any modules. I'll do that in subsequent PRs.
The forked version of the reconciler will be used to build a special
version of React DOM. I've called this build ReactDOMForked. It's only
built for www; there's no open source version.
The new reconciler is disabled by default. It's enabled in the
`yarn test-www-variant` command. The reconciler fork isn't really
related to the "variant" feature of the www builds, but I'm piggy
backing on that concept to avoid having to add yet another
testing dimension.
* Add ReactFlightServerConfig intermediate
This just forwards to the stream version of Flight which is itself forked
between Node and W3C streams.
The dom-relay goes directly to the Relay config though which allows it to
avoid the stream part of Flight.
* Separate streaming protocol into the Stream config
* Split streaming parts into the ReactFlightServerConfigStream
This decouples it so that the Relay implementation doesn't have to encode
the JSON to strings. Instead it can be fed the values as JSON objects and
do its own encoding.
* Split FlightClient into a basic part and a stream part
Same split as the server.
* Expose lower level async hooks to Relay
This requires an external helper file that we'll wire up internally.
* Rename to clarify that it's client-only
* Rename FizzStreamer to FizzServer for consistency
* Rename react-flight to react-client/flight
For consistency with react-server. Currently this just includes flight
but it could be expanded to include the whole reconciler.
* Add Relay Flight Build
* Rename ReactServerHostConfig to ReactServerStreamConfig
This will be the config specifically for streaming purposes.
There will be other configs for other purposes.
* Require deep for reconcilers
* Delete inline* files
* Delete react-reconciler/persistent
This no longer makes any sense because it react-reconciler takes
supportsMutation or supportsPersistence as options. It's no longer based
on feature flags.
* Fix jest mocking
* Fix Flow strategy
We now explicitly list which paths we want to be checked by a renderer.
For every other renderer config we ignore those paths.
Nothing is "any" typed. So if some transitive dependency isn't reachable
it won't be accidentally "any" that leaks.
In CI, we run our test suite against multiple build configurations. For
example, we run our tests in both dev and prod, and in both the
experimental and stable release channels. This is to prevent accidental
deviations in behavior between the different builds. If there's an
intentional deviation in behavior, the test author must account
for them.
However, we currently don't run tests against the www builds. That's
a problem, because it's common for features to land in www before they
land anywhere else, including the experimental release channel.
Typically we do this so we can gradually roll out the feature behind
a flag before deciding to enable it.
The way we test those features today is by mutating the
`shared/ReactFeatureFlags` module. There are a few downsides to this
approach, though. The flag is only overridden for the specific tests or
test suites where you apply the override. But usually what you want is
to run *all* tests with the flag enabled, to protect against unexpected
regressions.
Also, mutating the feature flags module only works when running the
tests against source, not against the final build artifacts, because the
ReactFeatureFlags module is inlined by the build script.
Instead, we should run the test suite against the www configuration,
just like we do for prod, experimental, and so on. I've added a new
command, `yarn test-www`. It automatically runs in CI.
Some of the www feature flags are dynamic; that is, they depend on
a runtime condition (i.e. a GK). These flags are imported from an
external module that lives in www. Those flags will be enabled for some
clients and disabled for others, so we should run the tests against
*both* modes.
So I've added a new global `__VARIANT__`, and a new test command `yarn
test-www-variant`. `__VARIANT__` is set to false by default; when
running `test-www-variant`, it's set to true.
If we were going for *really* comprehensive coverage, we would run the
tests against every possible configuration of feature flags: 2 ^
numberOfFlags total combinations. That's not practical, though, so
instead we only run against two combinations: once with `__VARIANT__`
set to `true`, and once with it set to `false`. We generally assume that
flags can be toggled independently, so in practice this should
be enough.
You can also refer to `__VARIANT__` in tests to detect which mode you're
running in. Or, you can import `shared/ReactFeatureFlags` and read the
specific flag you can about. However, we should stop mutating that
module going forward. Treat it as read-only.
In this commit, I have only setup the www tests to run against source.
I'll leave running against build for a follow up.
Many of our tests currently assume they run only in the default
configuration, and break when certain flags are toggled. Rather than fix
these all up front, I've hard-coded the relevant flags to the default
values. We can incrementally migrate those tests later.
* Only use Rollup's CommonJS plugin for "react-art"
We still need it for the "art" UMD builds but nothing else should have
CommonJS dependencies anymore.
* react-debug-tools and jest-react should leave object-assign as an external dep
This avoids it being compiled into the output.
* Check in a forked version of object-assign
This one uses ES modules so that we can inline it into UMD builds.
We could wait for object-assign to make an ESM export but we're going to
remove this dependency and assume global polyfills in the next version
anyway. However, we'd have to figure out how to keep the copyright header
and it'll get counted in terms of byte size (even if other tooling removes
it).
A lot of headache when we have our own implementation anyway. So I'll just
use that.
Ours is not resilient to checking certain browser bugs but those browsers
are mostly unused anyway. (Even FB breaks on them presumably.)
We also don't need to be resilient to Symbols since the way React uses it
we shouldn't need to copy symbols
* Don't transpile Object.assign to object-assign in object-assign
The polyfill needs to be able to feature detect Object.assign.
* Move remaining things to named exports
The interesting case here is the noop renderers. The wrappers around the
reconciler now changed to use a local export that gets mutated.
ReactNoop and ReactNoopPersistent now have to destructure the object to
list out the names it's going to export. We should probably refactor
ReactNoop away from createReactNoop. Especially since it's also not Flow
typed.
* Switch interactions to star exports
This will have esModule compatibility flag on them. They should ideally
export default instead.
The testing build versions of react-dom are included in the builds right now, but we're not ready to share them yet. This PR removes them for now (back soon for the next release)
* Add options for forked entry points
We currently fork .fb.js entry points. This adds a few more options.
.modern.fb.js - experimental FB builds
.classic.fb.js - stable FB builds
.fb.js - if no other FB build, use this for FB builds
.experimental.js - experimental builds
.stable.js - stable builds
.js - used if no other override exists
This will be used to have different ES exports for different builds.
* Switch React to named exports
* Export named exports from the export point itself
We need to re-export the Flow exported types so we can use them in our code.
We don't want to use the Flow types from upstream since it doesn't have the non-public APIs that we have.
This should be able to use export * but I don't know why it doesn't work.
This actually enables Flow typing of React which was just "any" before.
This exposed some Flow errors that needs fixing.
* Create forks for the react entrypoint
None of our builds expose all exports and they all differ in at least one
way, so we need four forks.
* Set esModule flag to false
We don't want to emit the esModule compatibility flag on our CommonJS
output. For now we treat our named exports as if they're CommonJS.
This is a potentially breaking change for scheduler (but all those apis
are unstable), react-is and use-subscription. However, it seems unlikely
that anyone would rely on this since these only have named exports.
* Remove unused Feature Flags
* Let jest observe the stable fork for stable tests
This lets it do the negative test by ensuring that the right tests fail.
However, this in turn will make other tests that are not behind
__EXPERIMENTAL__ fail. So I need to do that next.
* Put all tests that depend on exports behind __EXPERIMENTAL__
Since there's no way to override the exports using feature flags
in .intern.js anymore we can't use these APIs in stable.
The tradeoff here is that we can either enable the negative tests on
"stable" that means experimental are expected to fail, or we can disable
tests on stable. This is unfortunate since some of these APIs now run on
a "stable" config at FB instead of the experimental.
* Switch ReactDOM to named exports
Same strategy as React.
I moved the ReactDOMFB runtime injection to classic.fb.js
Since we only fork the entrypoint, the `/testing` entrypoint needs to
be forked too to re-export the same things plus `act`. This is a bit
unfortunate. If it becomes a pattern we can consider forking in the
module resolution deeply.
fix flow
* Fix ReactDOM Flow Types
Now that ReactDOM is Flow type checked we need to fix up its types.
* Configure jest to use stable entry for ReactDOM in non-experimental
* Remove additional FeatureFlags that are no longer needed
These are only flagging the exports and no implementation details so we
can control them fully through the export overrides.
* Build both stable and experimental WWW builds
* Flip already experimental WWW flags to true
* Remove FB-specific internals from modern FB builds
We think we're not going to need these.
* Disable classic features in modern WWW builds
* Disable legacy ReactDOM API for modern WWW build
* Don’t include user timing in prod
* Fix bad copy paste and add missing flags to test renderer
* Add testing WWW feature flag file
We need it because WWW has a different meaning of experimental now.
This PR introduces adds `react/testing` and `react-dom/testing`.
- changes infra to generate these builds
- exports act on ReactDOM in these testing builds
- uses the new test builds in fixtures/dom
In the next PR -
- I'll use the new builds for all our own tests
- I'll replace usages of TestUtils.act with ReactDOM.act.
* Update Flow to 0.84
* Fix violations
* Use inexact object syntax in files from fbsource
* Fix warning extraction to use a modern parser
* Codemod inexact objects to new syntax
* Tighten types that can be exact
* Revert unintentional formatting changes from codemod
* Replace all warning/lowPriWarning with console calls
* Replace console.warn/error with a custom wrapper at build time
* Fail the build for console.error/warn() where we can't read the stack
* prep for codemod
* prep warnings
* rename lint rules
* codemod for ifs
* shim www functions
* Handle more cases in the transform
* Thanks De Morgan
* Run the codemod
* Delete the transform
* Fix up confusing conditions manually
* Fix up www shims to match expected API
* Also check for low-pri warning in the lint rule
* Replace Babel plugin with an ESLint plugin
* Fix ESLint rule violations
* Move shared conditions higher
* Test formatting nits
* Tweak ESLint rule
* Bugfix: inside else branch, 'if' tests are not satisfactory
* Use a stricter check for exactly if (__DEV__)
This makes it easier to see what's going on and matches dominant style in the codebase.
* Fix remaining files after stricter check
* Move Flight DOM to Webpack Specific Packagee
We'll have Webpack specific coupling so we need to ensure that it can be
versioned separately from various Webpack versions. We'll also have builds
for other bundlers in the future.
* Move to peerDep
* Move DOM Flight Tests
* Merge ReactFlightIntegration into ReactFlightDOM
This was an integration test. We can add to it.
* Fix fixture paths
* Rename ReactFlightStreamer -> ReactFlightServer
* Unify Browser/Node stream tests into one file and use the client reader
* Defer to the actual ReactDOM for HTML rendering for now
This will need to use a variant of Fizz to do inline SSR in Flight.
However, I don't want to build the whole impl right now but also don't
want to exclude the use case yet. So I outsource it to the existing
renderer. Ofc, this doesn't work with Suspense atm.
* Change demo to server
* Expose client in package.json
* Reorganize tests
We don't want unit tests but instead test how both server and clients work
together. So this merges server/client test files.
* Fill in the client implementation a bit
* Use new client in fixture
* Add Promise/Uint8Array to lint rule
I'll probably end up deleting these deps later but they're here for now.
* Add Flight Build and Unify HostFormat Config between Flight and Fizz
* Add basic resolution of models
* Add basic Flight fixture
Demonstrates the streaming protocol.
* Rename to flight-server to distinguish from the client parts
* Add Flight Client package and entry point
* Fix fixture
`yarn build` defaults to building in experimental mode. To opt-out, set
the `RELEASE_CHANNEL` environment variable to `stable`. This is the same
as what we do when running tests via `yarn test`, to make local
development easier.
* Don't bother including `unstable_` in error
The method names don't get stripped out of the production bundles
because they are passed as arguments to the error decoder.
Let's just always use the unprefixed APIs in the messages.
* Set up experimental builds
The experimental builds are packaged exactly like builds in the stable
release channel: same file structure, entry points, and npm package
names. The goal is to match what will eventually be released in stable
as closely as possible, but with additional features turned on.
Versioning and Releasing
------------------------
The experimental builds will be published to the same registry and
package names as the stable ones. However, they will be versioned using
a separate scheme. Instead of semver versions, experimental releases
will receive arbitrary version strings based on their content hashes.
The motivation is to thwart attempts to use a version range to match
against future experimental releases. The only way to install or depend
on an experimental release is to refer to the specific version number.
Building
--------
I did not use the existing feature flag infra to configure the
experimental builds. The reason is because feature flags are designed
to configure a single package. They're not designed to generate multiple
forks of the same package; for each set of feature flags, you must
create a separate package configuration.
Instead, I've added a new build dimension called the **release
channel**. By default, builds use the **stable** channel. There's
also an **experimental** release channel. We have the option to add more
in the future.
There are now two dimensions per artifact: build type (production,
development, or profiling), and release channel (stable or
experimental). These are separate dimensions because they are
combinatorial: there are stable and experimental production builds,
stable and experimental developmenet builds, and so on.
You can add something to an experimental build by gating on
`__EXPERIMENTAL__`, similar to how we use `__DEV__`. Anything inside
these branches will be excluded from the stable builds.
This gives us a low effort way to add experimental behavior in any
package without setting up feature flags or configuring a new package.
