The previous regex to detect string substitutions is not quite right, this PR fixes it by:
Check to make sure we are starting either at the beginning of the line or we match a character that's not % to make sure we capture all the % in a row.
Make sure there are an odd number of % (the first X pairs are escaped % characters. The odd % followed by a letter is the string substitution)
Fixes#24302 based on #24306.
---
The current implementation for strict mode double logging stringiness and dims the second log. However, because we stringify everything, including objects, this causes objects to be logged as `[object Object]` etc.
This PR creates a new function that formats console log arguments with a specified style. It does this by:
1. The first param is a string that contains %c: Bail out and return the args without modifying the styles. We don't want to affect styles that the developer deliberately set.
2. The first param is a string that doesn't contain %c but contains string formatting: `[`%c${args[0]}`, style, ...args.slice(1)]` Note: we assume that the string formatting that the developer uses is correct.
3. The first param is a string that doesn't contain string formatting OR is not a string: Create a formatting string where:
- boolean, string, symbol -> %s
- number -> %f OR %i depending on if it's an int or float
- default -> %o
---
Co-authored-by: Billy Janitsch <billy@kensho.com>
Until now, DEV and PROFILING builds of React recorded Timeline profiling data using the User Timing API. This commit changes things so that React records this data by calling methods on the DevTools hook. (For now, DevTools still records that data using the User Timing API, to match previous behavior.)
This commit is large but most of it is just moving things around:
* New methods have been added to the DevTools hook (in "backend/profilingHooks") for recording the Timeline performance events.
* Reconciler's "ReactFiberDevToolsHook" has been updated to call these new methods (when they're present).
* User Timing method calls in "SchedulingProfiler" have been moved to DevTools "backend/profilingHooks" (to match previous behavior, for now).
* The old reconciler tests, "SchedulingProfiler-test" and "SchedulingProfilerLabels-test", have been moved into DevTools "TimelineProfiler-test" to ensure behavior didn't change unexpectedly.
* Two new methods have been added to the injected renderer interface: injectProfilingHooks() and getLaneLabelMap().
Relates to #22529.
This commit adds code to all React bundles to explicitly register the beginning and ending of the module. This is done by creating Error objects (which capture the file name, line number, and column number) and passing them explicitly to a DevTools hook (when present).
Next, as the Scheduling Profiler logs metadata to the User Timing API, it prints these module ranges along with other metadata (like Lane values and profiler version number).
Lastly, the Scheduling Profiler UI compares stack frames to these ranges when drawing the flame graph and dims or de-emphasizes frames that fall within an internal module.
The net effect of this is that user code (and 3rd party code) stands out clearly in the flame graph while React internal modules are dimmed.
Internal module ranges are completely optional. Older profiling samples, or ones recorded without the React DevTools extension installed, will simply not dim the internal frames.
* Revise ESLint rules for string coercion
Currently, react uses `'' + value` to coerce mixed values to strings.
This code will throw for Temporal objects or symbols.
To make string-coercion safer and to improve user-facing error messages,
This commit adds a new ESLint rule called `safe-string-coercion`.
This rule has two modes: a production mode and a non-production mode.
* If the `isProductionUserAppCode` option is true, then `'' + value`
coercions are allowed (because they're faster, although they may
throw) and `String(value)` coercions are disallowed. Exception:
when building error messages or running DEV-only code in prod
files, `String()` should be used because it won't throw.
* If the `isProductionUserAppCode` option is false, then `'' + value`
coercions are disallowed (because they may throw, and in non-prod
code it's not worth the risk) and `String(value)` are allowed.
Production mode is used for all files which will be bundled with
developers' userland apps. Non-prod mode is used for all other React
code: tests, DEV blocks, devtools extension, etc.
In production mode, in addiiton to flagging `String(value)` calls,
the rule will also flag `'' + value` or `value + ''` coercions that may
throw. The rule is smart enough to silence itself in the following
"will never throw" cases:
* When the coercion is wrapped in a `typeof` test that restricts to safe
(non-symbol, non-object) types. Example:
if (typeof value === 'string' || typeof value === 'number') {
thisWontReport('' + value);
}
* When what's being coerced is a unary function result, because unary
functions never return an object or a symbol.
* When the coerced value is a commonly-used numeric identifier:
`i`, `idx`, or `lineNumber`.
* When the statement immeidately before the coercion is a DEV-only
call to a function from shared/CheckStringCoercion.js. This call is a
no-op in production, but in DEV it will show a console error
explaining the problem, then will throw right after a long explanatory
code comment so that debugger users will have an idea what's going on.
The check function call must be in the following format:
if (__DEV__) {
checkXxxxxStringCoercion(value);
};
Manually disabling the rule is usually not necessary because almost all
prod use of the `'' + value` pattern falls into one of the categories
above. But in the rare cases where the rule isn't smart enough to detect
safe usage (e.g. when a coercion is inside a nested ternary operator),
manually disabling the rule will be needed.
The rule should also be manually disabled in prod error handling code
where `String(value)` should be used for coercions, because it'd be
bad to throw while building an error message or stack trace!
The prod and non-prod modes have differentiated error messages to
explain how to do a proper coercion in that mode.
If a production check call is needed but is missing or incorrect
(e.g. not in a DEV block or not immediately before the coercion), then
a context-sensitive error message will be reported so that developers
can figure out what's wrong and how to fix the problem.
Because string coercions are now handled by the `safe-string-coercion`
rule, the `no-primitive-constructor` rule no longer flags `String()`
usage. It still flags `new String(value)` because that usage is almost
always a bug.
* Add DEV-only string coercion check functions
This commit adds DEV-only functions to check whether coercing
values to strings using the `'' + value` pattern will throw. If it will
throw, these functions will:
1. Display a console error with a friendly error message describing
the problem and the developer can fix it.
2. Perform the coercion, which will throw. Right before the line where
the throwing happens, there's a long code comment that will help
debugger users (or others looking at the exception call stack) figure
out what happened and how to fix the problem.
One of these check functions should be called before all string coercion
of user-provided values, except when the the coercion is guaranteed not
to throw, e.g.
* if inside a typeof check like `if (typeof value === 'string')`
* if coercing the result of a unary function like `+value` or `value++`
* if coercing a variable named in a whitelist of numeric identifiers:
`i`, `idx`, or `lineNumber`.
The new `safe-string-coercion` internal ESLint rule enforces that
these check functions are called when they are required.
Only use these check functions in production code that will be bundled
with user apps. For non-prod code (and for production error-handling
code), use `String(value)` instead which may be a little slower but will
never throw.
* Add failing tests for string coercion
Added failing tests to verify:
* That input, select, and textarea elements with value and defaultValue
set to Temporal-like objects which will throw when coerced to string
using the `'' + value` pattern.
* That text elements will throw for Temporal-like objects
* That dangerouslySetInnerHTML will *not* throw for Temporal-like
objects because this value is not cast to a string before passing to
the DOM.
* That keys that are Temporal-like objects will throw
All tests above validate the friendly error messages thrown.
* Use `String(value)` for coercion in non-prod files
This commit switches non-production code from `'' + value` (which
throws for Temporal objects and symbols) to instead use `String(value)`
which won't throw for these or other future plus-phobic types.
"Non-produciton code" includes anything not bundled into user apps:
* Tests and test utilities. Note that I didn't change legacy React
test fixtures because I assumed it was good for those files to
act just like old React, including coercion behavior.
* Build scripts
* Dev tools package - In addition to switching to `String`, I also
removed special-case code for coercing symbols which is now
unnecessary.
* Add DEV-only string coercion checks to prod files
This commit adds DEV-only function calls to to check if string coercion
using `'' + value` will throw, which it will if the value is a Temporal
object or a symbol because those types can't be added with `+`.
If it will throw, then in DEV these checks will show a console error
to help the user undertsand what went wrong and how to fix the
problem. After emitting the console error, the check functions will
retry the coercion which will throw with a call stack that's easy (or
at least easier!) to troubleshoot because the exception happens right
after a long comment explaining the issue. So whether the user is in
a debugger, looking at the browser console, or viewing the in-browser
DEV call stack, it should be easy to understand and fix the problem.
In most cases, the safe-string-coercion ESLint rule is smart enough to
detect when a coercion is safe. But in rare cases (e.g. when a coercion
is inside a ternary) this rule will have to be manually disabled.
This commit also switches error-handling code to use `String(value)`
for coercion, because it's bad to crash when you're trying to build
an error message or a call stack! Because `String()` is usually
disallowed by the `safe-string-coercion` ESLint rule in production
code, the rule must be disabled when `String()` is used.
Previously, DevTools always overrode the native console to dim or supress StrictMode double logging. It also overrode console.log (in addition to console.error and console.warn). However, this changes the location shown by the browser console, which causes a bad developer experience. There is currently a TC39 proposal that would allow us to extend console without breaking developer experience, but in the meantime this PR changes the StrictMode console override behavior so that we only patch the console during the StrictMode double render so that, during the first render, the location points to developer code rather than our DevTools console code.
React currently suppress console logs in StrictMode during double rendering. However, this causes a lot of confusion. This PR moves the console suppression logic from React into React Devtools. Now by default, we no longer suppress console logs. Instead, we gray out the logs in console during double render. We also add a setting in React Devtools to allow developers to hide console logs during double render if they choose.
I recently added UI for the Profiler's commit and post-commit durations to the DevTools, but I made two pretty silly oversights:
1. I used the commit hook (called after mutation+layout effects) to read both the layout and passive effect durations. This is silly because passive effects may not have flushed yet git at this point.
2. I didn't reset the values on the HostRoot node, so they accumulated with each commit.
This commitR addresses both issues:
1. First it adds a new DevTools hook, onPostCommitRoot*, to be called after passive effects get flushed. This gives DevTools the opportunity to read passive effect durations (if the build of React being profiled supports it).
2. Second the work loop resets these durations (on the HostRoot) after calling the post-commit hook so address the accumulation problem.
I've also added a unit test to guard against this regressing in the future.
* Doing this in flushPassiveEffectsImpl seemed simplest, since there are so many places we flush passive effects. Is there any potential problem with this though?
This commit adds a new tab to the Settings modal: Debugging
This new tab has the append component stacks feature and a new one: break on warn
This new feature adds a debugger statement into the console override
