Alternative to #33421. The difference is that this also adds an
underscore between the "R" and the ID.
The reason we wanted to use special characters is because we use the
full spectrum of A-Z 0-9 in our ID generation so we can basically
collide with any common word (or anyone using a similar algorithm,
base64 or even base16). It's a little less likely that someone would put
`_R_` specifically unless you generate like two IDs separated by
underscore.
For the `useId` algorithm we used colon `:` before and after.
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/23360
This avoids collisions in general by using an unusual characters. It
also avoids collisions when concatenated with some other ID.
Unfortunately, `:` is not a valid character in `view-transition-name`.
This PR swaps the format from:
```
:r123:
```
To the unicode:
```
«r123»
```
Which is valid CSS selectors. This also allows them being used for
`querySelector()` which we didn't really find a legit use for but seems
ok-ish.
That way you can get a view-transition-name that you can manually
reference. E.g. to generate styles:
```js
const id = useId();
return <>
<style>{`
::view-transition-group(${id}) { ... }
::view-transition-old(${id}) { ... }
::view-transition-new(${id}) { ... }
`}</style>
<ViewTransition name={id}>...</ViewTransition>
</>;
```
This was missed in the mount dev dispatcher. It was only in the rerender
dispatcher which means that it was only logged during the rerender.
Since DevTools can hide logs during rerenders, this hid the warning in
StrictMode.
This is similar to #28771 but for isomorphic. We need a make over for
these dispatchers anyway so this is the first step. Also helps flush out
some internals usage that will break anyway.
It flattens the inner mutable objects onto the ReactSharedInternals.
This removes defaultProps support for all component types except for
classes. We've chosen to continue supporting defaultProps for classes
because lots of older code relies on it, and unlike function components,
(which can use default params), there's no straightforward alternative.
By implication, it also removes support for setting defaultProps on
`React.lazy` wrapper. So this will not work:
```js
const MyClassComponent = React.lazy(() => import('./MyClassComponent'));
// MyClassComponent is not actually a class; it's a lazy wrapper. So
// defaultProps does not work.
MyClassComponent.defaultProps = { foo: 'bar' };
```
However, if you set the default props on the class itself, then it's
fine.
For classes, this change also moves where defaultProps are resolved.
Previously, defaultProps were resolved by the JSX runtime. This change
is only observable if you introspect a JSX element, which is relatively
rare but does happen.
In other words, previously `<ClassWithDefaultProp />.props.aDefaultProp`
would resolve to the default prop value, but now it does not.
Reverting some of https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/27804 which
renamed this option to stable. This PR just replaces internal usage to
make upcoming PRs cleaner.
Keeping isConcurrent unstable for the next major release in order to
enable a broader deprecation of RTR and be consistent with concurrent
rendering everywhere for next major.
(https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/28498)
- Next major will use concurrent root
- The old behavior (legacy root by default, concurrent root with
unstable option) will be preserved for React Native until new
architecture is fully shipped.
- Flag and legacy root usage can be removed after RN dependency is
unblocked without an additional breaking change
## Summary
We need to unblock flipping the default for RTR to be concurrent
rendering. Update ReactDevToolsHooksIntegration-test to use
`unstable_isConcurrent` in place.
## How did you test this change?
`yarn test
packages/react-debug-tools/src/__tests__/ReactDevToolsHooksIntegration-test.js`
## Summary
Currently, `ReactHooksInspection-test.js` fails because something is
polluting the resulting `Promise` with symbol properties. This changes
the unit test to be more resilient to such symbol properties.
## How did you test this change?
Ran the following successfully:
```
$ yarn test
```
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
This solves the problem of the devtools extension failing to parse hook
names for components that make use of `useSyncExternalStore` or
`useTransition`.
See #27889
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
I tested this against my own codebases and against the example repro
project that I linked in #27889.
To test, I opened up the Components tab of the dev tools extension,
selected a component with hooks that make use of `useSyncExternalStore`
or `useTransition`, clicked the "parse hook names" magic wand button,
and observed that it now succeeds.
This option was added defensively but it's not needed. There's no cost
to including it always.
I suspect this optional was added mainly to avoid needing to update
tests. That's not a reason to have an unnecessary public API though.
We have a praxis for dealing with source location in tests to avoid them
failing tests. I also ported them to inline snapshots so that additions
to the protocol isn't such a pain.
Alternative to #28295.
Instead of stashing all of the Usables eagerly, we can extract them by
replaying the render when we need them like we do with any other hook.
We already had an implementation of `use()` but it wasn't quite
complete.
These can also include further DebugInfo on them such as what Server
Component rendered the Promise or async debug info. This is nice just to
see which use() calls were made in the side-panel but it can also be
used to gather everything that might have suspended.
Together with https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/28286 we cover the
case when a Promise was used a child and if it was unwrapped with use().
Notably we don't cover a Promise that was thrown (although we do support
that in a Server Component which maybe we shouldn't). Throwing a Promise
isn't officially supported though and that use case should move to the
use() Hook.
The pattern of conditionally suspending based on cache also isn't really
supported with the use() pattern. You should always call use() if you
previously called use() with the same input. This also ensures that we
can track what might have suspended rather than what actually did.
One limitation of this strategy is that it's hard to find all the places
something might suspend in a tree without rerendering all the fibers
again. So we might need to still add something to the tree to indicate
which Fibers may have further debug info / thenables.
## Summary
Add support for `useFormState` Hook fixing "Unsupported hook in the
react-debug-tools package: Missing method in Dispatcher: useFormState"
when inspecting components using `useFormState`
## How did you test this change?
- Added test to ReactHooksInspectionIntegration
- Added dedicated section for form actions to devtools-shell
## Summary
Add support for `useOptimistic` Hook fixing "Unsupported hook in the
react-debug-tools package: Missing method in Dispatcher: useOptimistic"
when inspecting components using `useOptimistic`
## How did you test this change?
- Added test following the same pattern as for `useDeferredValue`
## Summary
Concurrent rendering has been the default since React 18 release.
ReactTestRenderer requires passing `{unstable_isConcurrent: true}` to
match this behavior, which means by default tests written with RTR use a
different rendering method than the code they test.
Eventually, RTR should only use ConcurrentRoot. As a first step, let's
add a version of the concurrent option that isn't marked unstable. Next
we will follow up with removing the unstable option when it is safe to
merge.
## How did you test this change?
`yarn test
packages/react-test-renderer/src/__tests__/ReactTestRendererAsync-test.js`
In https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/27472 I've removed broken
`useMemoCache` implementation and replaced it with a stub. It actually
produces errors when trying to inspect components, which are compiled
with Forget.
The main difference from the implementation in
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/26696 is that we are using
corresponding `Fiber` here, which has patched `updateQueue` with
`memoCache`. Previously we would check it on a hook object, which
doesn't have `updateQueue`.
Tested on pages, which are using Forget and by inspecting elements,
which are transpiled with Forget.
Adds a second argument to useDeferredValue called initialValue:
```js
const value = useDeferredValue(finalValue, initialValue);
```
During the initial render of a component, useDeferredValue will return
initialValue. Once that render finishes, it will spawn an additional
render to switch to finalValue.
This same sequence should occur whenever the hook is hidden and revealed
again, i.e. by a Suspense or Activity, though this part is not yet
implemented.
When initialValue is not provided, useDeferredValue has no effect during
initial render, but during an update, it will remain on the previous
value, then spawn an additional render to switch to the new value. (This
is the same behavior that exists today.)
During SSR, initialValue is always used, if provided.
This feature is currently behind an experimental flag. We plan to ship
it in a non-breaking release.
## Summary
This PR cleans up `useMutableSource`. This has been blocked by a
remaining dependency internally at Meta, but that has now been deleted.
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
## How did you test this change?
```
yarn flow
yarn lint
yarn test --prod
```
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
useMemoCache wasn't previously supported in the DevTools, so any attempt
to inspect a component using the hook would result in a
`dispatcher.useMemoCache is not a function (it is undefined)` error.
- substr is Annex B
- substring silently flips its arguments if they're in the "wrong order", which is confusing
- slice is better than sliced bread (no pun intended) and also it works the same way on Arrays so there's less to remember
---
> I'd be down to just lint and enforce a single form just for the potential compression savings by using a repeated string.
_Originally posted by @sebmarkbage in https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/26663#discussion_r1170455401_
This fixes a handful of tests that were accidentally relying on React
synchronously queuing work in the Scheduler after a setState.
Usually this is because they use a lower level SchedulerMock method
instead of either `act` or one of the `waitFor` helpers. In some cases,
the solution is to switch to those APIs. In other cases, if we're
intentionally testing some lower level behavior, we might have to be a
bit more clever.
Co-authored-by: Tianyu Yao <skyyao@fb.com>
Prior to #26347, our internal `act` API (not the public API) behaved
differently depending on whether the scope function returned a promise
(i.e. was an async function), for historical reasons that no longer
apply. Now that this is fixed, I've codemodded all async act scopes that
don't contain an await to be sync.
No pressing motivation other than it looks nicer and the codemod was
easy. Might help avoid confusion for new contributors who see async act
scopes with nothing async inside and infer it must be like that for a
reason.
This is not a public API. We only use it for our internal tests, the
ones in this repo. Let's move it to this private package. Practically
speaking this will also let us use async/await in the implementation.
Similar to the rationale for `waitFor` (see #26285), we should always
await the result of an `act` call so that microtasks have a chance to
fire.
This only affects the internal `act` that we use in our repo, for now.
In the public `act` API, we don't yet require this; however, we
effectively will for any update that triggers suspense once `use` lands.
So we likely will start warning in an upcoming minor.
Similar to the rationale for `waitFor` (see
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/26285), we should always await
the result of an `act` call so that microtasks have a chance to fire.
This only affects the internal `act` that we use in our repo, for now.
In the public `act` API, we don't yet require this; however, we
effectively will for any update that triggers suspense once `use` lands.
So we likely will start warning in an upcoming minor.
This converts some of our test suite to use the `waitFor` test pattern,
instead of the `expect(Scheduler).toFlushAndYield` pattern. Most of
these changes are automated with jscodeshift, with some slight manual
cleanup in certain cases.
See #26285 for full context.
The old version of prettier we were using didn't support the Flow syntax
to access properties in a type using `SomeType['prop']`. This updates
`prettier` and `rollup-plugin-prettier` to the latest versions.
I added the prettier config `arrowParens: "avoid"` to reduce the diff
size as the default has changed in Prettier 2.0. The largest amount of
changes comes from function expressions now having a space. This doesn't
have an option to preserve the old behavior, so we have to update this.
