* Attempt to fix ReactDOMTextComponent test in Fiber
Obviously, some tests pass but the reconciliation is still incomplete on this in Fiber.
Those changes just ignore reconciliation Comments while asserting (this fixes 2 tests already) but now shows that Fiber lacks some reconciliation features.
* Transmit a parentInstance to commitTextUpdate
This is done in case a Node#normalize() was performed on the parent instance and that the TextInstance got desolidarized from the parent. We provide the parent known by the parent Fiber to reattach the DOM node in this case.
* Added a more complex case around split nodes
This test does not assume one split node substitution alone but also some non-split nodes.
* Fiber supports split text nodes
This is done by suppressing nodes appearing during the split. this is based by comparing against the old value known by the Fiber.
* Simplify siblings cleaning in commitTextUpdate
No need to assert instanceof Text since the length comparator will work correctly.
* Ensure non-text nodes won't be removed
* Fix flow for Fiber Text reconciliation additions
Mostly define types as optionals. Respects the strict DOM API around Node & Element.
* Append at any stack stage only if necessary
The direct parent of the TextNode fiber may not contain the host node. We have to go through the hierarchy. However, since this work may be expensive, we only do it if absolutely necessary!
* Use tag & ReactTypeOfWork to find an HostComponent
* Addfailing scenario when running Node.normalize()
It happens when non-text-elements are added in the mix. @sebmarkbage seems to have an idea on how to fix it. This is just a repro of the bug!
* Register failing/passing fiber tests
This gets rid of the global flag on if something has listened to onSelect
and instead reads the isListening map if all the events are covered.
This is required if we want to attach events locally at roots.
Could be slower perf wise to handle events. An alternative solution would
be to attach a special flag on the listener map for the document so we
don't have to check the full dependency list.
However, my favorite solution would be to just eagerly attach all event
listeners (except maybe wheel). Then we don't have to do any of this stuff
on a per element basis.
* Print a warning in fiber for lacking render method
* Reject initial non-object state in Fiber
Rejects Arrays, Strings & Numbers. Allows nulls.
* Centralize fiber checks on ES6 Classes
* Add classic & instance property checks on fiber
- check the absence of getInitialState & getDefaultProps as methods
- check the absence of propTypes & contextTypes at instance-level
* Convert to normalized React `warning` calls
* Support lifecycle typo detection in fiber
* Get the complete warnings from the existing code
* Only check classInstance once
Avoid rechecking while resuming
* Can warn component while resuming but only once
This is achieved by tracking the warning state in the Fiber structure.
* Remove warning deduplication
* Factor name retrieval in a getName helper
* Use invariant instead of throw
* Read inst.state only once for the invariant
* Fix condition on the instance state
* Register failing/passing fiber tests
* Refactor scheduling functions and introduce Task priority
There was lots of duplication across all the scheduling functions. I
think we're far enough along that we can start trying to clean some
stuff up.
Also introduces a new priority level provisionally called Task priority.
This is for work that completes at the end of the current tick, after
the current batch of work has been committed. It's different from
Synchronous priority, which needs to complete immediately.
A full implementation of Task priority will follow. It will replace
the current batching solution.
* Implement Task priority
Task priority is similar to Synchronous priority. Both are flushed in
the current tick. Synchronous priority is flushed immediately (e.g. sync
work triggered by setState will flush before setState exits), where as
Task is flushed after the current batch of work is committed.
Currently used for batchedUpdates and nested sync updates. Task should
also be used for componentDidUpdate/Mount and error boundary work. I'll
add this in a later commit.
* Make error boundaries use Task Priority
I have all but one error fixed. Not sure how tricky the last one is,
but I'm cautiously optimistic. Pushing to show my current progress.
* Remove recursion from handleErrors
Changed the algorithm of handleErrors a bit to ensure that boundaries
are not revisited once they are acknowledged.
* Add incremental error boundary test
Discovered an edge case: a noop error boundary will break in incremental
mode unless you explicitly schedule an update.
* Refactor error boundaries in Fiber
* Simplify trapError() calls
The existing logic was written before we had a proper error handling system.
* Remove unnecessary flags
* Prevent performTaskWork recursion
* Be stricter about preventing recursion
Before, this code was bailing out after encoutering a null child because it thought it was out of old children. Seen when reconciling [null, <span />, <Image />] with [null, <span />, <Image />] in XUISelector.
Instead of scheduling individual callbacks to asap, we schedule one and
then do all the work in that one.
I'm doing this for architectural refactoring reasons.
Nevertheless, I'm adding a contrived unit test that this fixes. :)
* Make test more complete
* Add a failing test for scheduling in reverse order
It hangs forever because we don't clear next pointer when unscheduling a root. Therefore, when it's scheduled again, it brings all its previous chain with it, potentially creating a cycle.
* Clear the next pointer when unscheduling a root
Fixes a potential infinite cycle when we reschedule a root.
* Add new tests to Fiber test tracker
* Introduce facts-tracker
We want to be able to track various things like number of files that are flowified, number of tests passing with Fiber...
This introduces a tool that lets you do that. The API is very simple, you execute the script with a list of tuples [key value] and it's going to create a `facts` branch and put a txt file for each fact and values over time.
```
node scripts/facts-tracker/index.js \
"flow-files" "$COUNT_WITH_FLOW/$COUNT_ALL_FILES"
```
Test Plan:
This is tricky to test because Travis only exposes the private variables (github token) when it processes a committed file and not on branches. The reason is that otherwise anyone could send a pull requests that does `echo $GITHUB_TOKEN` and steal your token.
Given this constraint, I did all the work using two of my repos:
- https://github.com/vjeux/facts-tracker
- https://github.com/vjeux/facts-tracker-test
and am sending this pull request that should work as is /fingers crossed/, but we won't be able to test it out until it is committed.
Note that once this lands, I'm going to kill those two repos.
* Update with all the suggested changes
* Branch on a flow type in travis.yml
* Use $GITHUB_TOKEN
* properly escape it
Jest 15 has just been released and is way more awesome: http://facebook.github.io/jest/blog/2016/09/01/jest-15.html
This pull request updates jest from version 12 to 15. Right now there's a fix in jest around Symbol that hasn't been released yet, so this will break CI and cannot be merged it. But once it ships by the end of the day, we'll be good to go :)
See comments inline for all the changes I've done.
We currently write all our tests against the DOM implementation.
I need a way to run the Fiber tests against it. But I don't want
to take on any package dependencies on Fiber modules yet.
There's a problem with jest right now where you can't globally
mock modules that already exist. So I have to add a global call
to jest.mock.
Luckily we already have a way to test the useCreateElement paths
using a feature flag. I won't activate this flag in travis until
it passes, but the idea is to run all three variants in travis.
I'm not sure that invoking rAF and rIC synchronously is the best
way to test this since it doesn't capture the backwards
compatibility aspect. I.e. the fact that people might be relying
on the synchronous nature in real apps too. It's a start.
Ideally, jest would have these built-in.
Previously, the extract-components script would create the same number of layers of composites as the page it captures, but it would output a new class for each time any composite is used (since we don't want to replicate all the component logic).
I changed the script to output a single type for each type in the input -- and each generated component takes an index for which output it should return. This should be closer to how the original code behaves, especially with respect to VM function call lookups where the amount of polymorphism makes a difference.
I re-recorded the benchmarks with the new scripts. They run significantly faster:
```
Comparing old.txt (control) vs new.txt (test)
Significant differences marked by ***
% change from control to test, with 99% CIs:
* ssr_pe_cold_ms_jsc_jit
% change: -41.73% [-43.37%, -40.09%] ***
means: 39.3191 (control), 22.9127 (test)
* ssr_pe_cold_ms_jsc_nojit
% change: -44.24% [-46.69%, -41.80%] ***
means: 45.8646 (control), 25.5764 (test)
* ssr_pe_cold_ms_node
% change: -45.61% [-47.38%, -43.85%] ***
means: 90.1118 (control), 49.0116 (test)
```
This is probably in part due to the changes here, but also the page I captured has changed somewhat in the meantime and there seem to be slightly fewer components in the hierarchy, so they're not really comparable. But going forward we can use this benchmark which should be more accurate. I also included an identical copy that uses stateless functional components so we can test optimizations to those later.
Test Plan: Changed the preprocessor to log the output of babel.transform and saw
```
var _jsxFileName = 'src/isomorphic/modern/element/__tests__/ReactJSXElementValidator-test.js';
```
in the resulting output, instead of an absolute path.
Running this is left as an exercise for the reader, since my measure.py isn't designed for this at present. But something like this might work:
```diff
diff --git a/scripts/bench/measure.py b/scripts/bench/measure.py
index 4cedf47..627ec97 100755
--- a/scripts/bench/measure.py
+++ b/scripts/bench/measure.py
@@ -79,15 +79,12 @@ def _measure_ssr_ms(engine, react_path, bench_name, bench_path, measure_warm):
if (typeof React !== 'object') throw new Error('React not laoded');
report('factory_ms', END - START);
- globalEval(readFile(ENV.bench_path));
- if (typeof Benchmark !== 'function') {
- throw new Error('benchmark not loaded');
- }
+ globalEval("bm = (function(){" + readFile("bench-createclass-madman.js") + "})");
+ bm();
var START = now();
- var html = React.renderToString(React.createElement(Benchmark));
- html.charCodeAt(0); // flatten ropes
+ bm();
var END = now();
- report('ssr_' + ENV.bench_name + '_cold_ms', END - START);
+ report('cc_' + ENV.bench_name + '_cold_ms', END - START);
var warmup = ENV.measure_warm ? 80 : 0;
var trials = ENV.measure_warm ? 40 : 0;
@@ -119,7 +116,7 @@ def _main():
return 1
react_path = sys.argv[1]
- trials = 30
+ trials = 60
sys.stderr.write("Measuring SSR for PE benchmark (%d trials)\n" % trials)
for i in range(trials):
for engine in [
@@ -132,7 +129,7 @@ def _main():
sys.stderr.flush()
sys.stderr.write("\n")
- trials = 3
+ trials = 0#3
sys.stderr.write("Measuring SSR for PE with warm JIT (%d slow trials)\n" % trials)
for i in range(trials):
for engine in [
```
