* Improved for a better understanding
that code shouldn't name this parameter onchange. It is so confusing for a starter of ReactJs like me. It looks like that the onChange is an common event from props.
* Update the lifting state up paragraph
I tried to write something to explain to starter programmers in react, how we lift the state up calling a method defined by the ancestor and called by the children that will affect the children element.
* Rewrite Lifting State Up
* Add note about refs on stateless components
* Move info about refs in the stateless components to the main section
* Simplification of the part about refs and functional components
* Tweaks
* Move sections around
* Oops
* Rearrange more sections
* Add onToggle event to details tag
Fixes#8761
* Map onToggle event on ReactDOMFiberComponent
* Tweak doc
* Trap events on setInitialProperties for details tag
* Explain arbitrariness of ref name in callback
The sample code was confusing because it's not clear that "textInput" in this.textInput is an arbitrary name for the ref.
* Tweak wording
* Add benchmarking tutorial
I've written what I hope is the simplest introduction to benchmarking React components. It's meant to be straightforward and easy to follow for beginners. If you agree that it would be helpful, I'd like to add it to the docs.
Would also welcome any and all feedback.
* Just put links together
* Reminder: strip quotes from attributes with JS code
Web developers who are used to standards-compliant HTML and XML will, out of habit, put quotes around all attributes because the standards require them. Other templating systems like ASP.NET also require (or at least allow) quotes around attributes that contain code. This behavior will get users into trouble in JSX because a quoted attribute is always treated as a string literal, even if it contains curly-braced javascript code. Let's add to the docs to help newbies evade this problem.
* Tweak wording
* use an easier word
The word `mandatory` is relatively difficult for people with ESL (English as a second language), so I propose an alternative word.
This would be much easier to understand.
* use simpler word
