features → feature
> There is nothing "bad" about using state or lifecycle hooks in components. Like any powerful feature**s**, they should be used in moderation, but we have no intention to remove them.
I can’t explain the exact grammatical principle this violates, but it sounds wrong to my native English ears that “feature” is plural here. Another way to check if the grammar sounds right is to change the order of the clauses: ”They should be used in moderation, like any powerful feature“ sounds right, whereas “They should be used in moderation, like any powerful features” does not.
* Fix typo in Proposing a Change section in how-to-contribute.md
Not sure if it was actually intended or was a typo but changed 'If you intend to change to the public API' --> 'If you intend to make a change to the public API'
* Simplify
* Add more to Codebase Overview
* WIP
* Start a reconciler overview
* Add a few more sections
* todo
* WIP
* Finish it
* Whitespace
* Minor tweaks
* Minor tweaks
- Reverts change to use sectionid on layouts (was unreliable), using config to make sure that's specified on all pages that need it
- Adds permalinks to all other pages so that og data is correct
- Corrects some permalinks that were in correct (translations)
